Wetfish Online

Discussion Forums => Suggestions & Feedback => Topic started by: rachel on May 28, 2020, 12:35:33 am

Title: [Meta-Discussion] Should what be glined from FishNet?
Post by: rachel on May 28, 2020, 12:35:33 am
Quote
00:51 < what> its nazi time
01:11 -!- Anomaly [[email protected]] has quit [Client exited]
01:27 -!- what changed the topic of #freefish to: WHITE POWER
01:29 -!- what is now known as Clayton_Bigsby
01:31 < Clayton_Bigsby> I CAN'T UNDERSTAND YOU
01:32 < Clayton_Bigsby> GO BACK TO YOUR COUNTRY
01:32 < Clayton_Bigsby> WHITE POWER
Title: Re: [Meta-Discussion] Should what be glined from FishNet?
Post by: FrobtheBuilder on May 28, 2020, 01:13:00 am
Yes, absolutely. He's an aggressively fucking stupid /pol/tard and incapable of discussing anything in good faith. He dramatically lowers the quality of any discussion he takes part in.
Title: Re: [Meta-Discussion] Should what be glined from FishNet?
Post by: nicefish on May 28, 2020, 03:07:49 am
No. He's quarantined in #freefish. #freefish is made for this purpose.
Unless he's ban evading other channels I don't think he should be glined.
Title: Re: [Meta-Discussion] Should what be glined from FishNet?
Post by: nicefish on May 28, 2020, 03:13:32 am
It's like you guys sent the idiots off to Australia, but then you decided Australia was quite nice and you want to be there too.
Title: Re: [Meta-Discussion] Should what be glined from FishNet?
Post by: nicefish on May 28, 2020, 03:28:21 am
Maybe #wetfish has become too soy and that's why #freefish is so nice now.
Title: Re: [Meta-Discussion] Should what be glined from FishNet?
Post by: rachel on May 28, 2020, 03:34:42 am
It's like you guys sent the idiots off to Australia, but then you decided Australia was quite nice and you want to be there too.

Lmao
Title: Re: [Meta-Discussion] Should what be glined from FishNet?
Post by: nicefish on May 28, 2020, 04:33:05 am
Also, there is a /ignore command in IRC
Title: Re: [Meta-Discussion] Should what be glined from FishNet?
Post by: nicefish on May 28, 2020, 04:40:38 am
But no, you just jump for the nuclear option to deprive an autist of his outlet, when you could just use /ignore.
Title: Re: [Meta-Discussion] Should what be glined from FishNet?
Post by: nicefish on May 28, 2020, 04:42:29 am
(https://thegrio.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/AmyCooper.jpg)
Title: Re: [Meta-Discussion] Should what be glined from FishNet?
Post by: rachel on May 28, 2020, 04:43:23 am
I'm glad you are so passionate about this. /ignore doesn't really solve the problem. I don't care what he has to say, but I'm tired of people complaining about him. Even if I /ignore him, people are still going to complain about him to me
Title: Re: [Meta-Discussion] Should what be glined from FishNet?
Post by: nicefish on May 28, 2020, 04:44:27 am
I'm glad you are so passionate about this. /ignore doesn't really solve the problem. I don't care what he has to say, but I'm tired of people complaining about him. Even if I /ignore him, people are still going to complain about him to me

Those people should /ignore him then.
Title: Re: [Meta-Discussion] Should what be glined from FishNet?
Post by: nicefish on May 28, 2020, 04:44:54 am
I'm glad you are so passionate about this. /ignore doesn't really solve the problem. I don't care what he has to say, but I'm tired of people complaining about him. Even if I /ignore him, people are still going to complain about him to me

Those people should /ignore him then.

Instead of complaining to you.
Title: Re: [Meta-Discussion] Should what be glined from FishNet?
Post by: tawd on May 28, 2020, 05:22:05 am
What pretty much hates me and literally everything I've ever done in my life and thinks I'm a terrible person. 

But I think I've still had like one normal conversation with him that didn't go totally dsockwell (but I can't remember)

I thought freefish was basically the anything goes channel so stuff like he does sort of belongs there? This is confusing. 

I mean maybe slap him around a little  and tug on his nips or something, put some dirty socks in his mouth i guess? but don't ban him
Title: Re: [Meta-Discussion] Should what be glined from FishNet?
Post by: M-C on May 28, 2020, 06:17:55 am
.
Title: Re: [Meta-Discussion] Should what be glined from FishNet?
Post by: here cums the fuck truck on May 28, 2020, 06:22:08 am
discord makes ignoring easier i can do it with GUI clicks instead of typing and looking up hostmask and has taught me to be quite liberal with ignores, but not permanently. Sometimes I just ignore someone for a day, or an hour, or ten minutes, while they go off on some weird shit.

it sounds like the real problem isn't what's behavior but people complaining about what to rachel; and a group failure to cooperatively live by those six simple words "don't bother rachel about dumb shit"

i used to expect mods to make their domain less shitty; now i realize how fucking exhausting moderation is, not just in time spent dealing with complaints but with emotional and mental.. garbage. trying to be objective about complaints often will completely ruin a mods personal enjoyment of a thing.

i'm starting to think moderation should be a paid, professional job. i would pay $2/month for a forum that was professionally moderated.

No? wtf are u doin rachel?

Your stated reason is too many people are whining about him to you.

1) name the anonymous whiners so theyre less likely to talk shit behind ppls backs in future

2) youre falling for classic squeaky wheel pressure tactics. this is how you turn into THE MAN

dont be a huge bitch rachel come on. this has annoyed me.

Besides all of this, complaining about anything that happens in freefish is invalid, by definition.

I know what is a cock, he even used to try and bulli me quite a lot until i passed his retarded shittests or whatever, but still.

Wetfish turning into a popularity contest seems far more offensive than anything a droll retard like what could ever do tbh.

i agree with all this. also what used to really piss me off and doesn't anymore, idk who changed.
Title: Re: [Meta-Discussion] Should what be glined from FishNet?
Post by: here cums the fuck truck on May 28, 2020, 06:23:21 am
also i'm barely on the IRC anymore but i love thinking and talking about group dynamics and i Believe that wetfish can be Something Better
Title: Re: [Meta-Discussion] Should what be glined from FishNet?
Post by: Kitlero on May 28, 2020, 06:35:14 am
Way back when people loved to complain about What. It got to a point where the electoral divide on political views targeted him very strongly and he would get banned for what would actually be considered slight inconveniences or just annoying people. Not even annoying in Classic What fashion. His ban was reversed and the excessively left Fish Moderators were hurt that you wouldn't just toss him out. To prevent their leaving #FREEFISH was born to house What in containment away from the main foyer of Wetfish. A place where anyone could talk about anything and there would be no repercussions. Politics, Global Warming Climate Change, views on xenoestrogens and isoflavones, the posting of gore and anything else that would pull away from the standard nature of the Wetfish channel.

Now apparently, while in the Badlands, What has performed some crime against humanity that deserves his execution? Operating in a land that was formed specifically for him and that has no rules?

My Vote is No.
Title: Re: [Meta-Discussion] Should what be glined from FishNet?
Post by: Anomaly on May 28, 2020, 11:31:07 am
Have what and emcy fight in a battle to the death. Sell tickets. Whoever wins, we lose.
Title: Re: [Meta-Discussion] Should what be glined from FishNet?
Post by: nicefish on May 28, 2020, 11:55:43 am
You know what this reminds me of? Gentrification.
Evict what from #wetfish to #freefish because he doesn't have enough social capital.
Then decide that you want to be in #freefish, so you boot what even further.
No wait, even worse, people complaining about what in #freefish are pulling an Amy Cooper -- make a call to rachel in attempt to get what glined.
Title: Re: [Meta-Discussion] Should what be glined from FishNet?
Post by: nicefish on May 28, 2020, 11:56:14 am
(https://thegrio.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/AmyCooper.jpg)
Title: Re: [Meta-Discussion] Should what be glined from FishNet?
Post by: Kitlero on May 28, 2020, 12:04:32 pm
You know what this reminds me of? Gentrification.
Evict what from #wetfish to #freefish because he doesn't have enough social capital.
Then decide that you want to be in #freefish, so you boot what even further.
No wait, even worse, people complaining about what in #freefish are pulling an Amy Cooper -- make a call to rachel in attempt to get what glined.

Freef is literally What's home provided by the state, and now that people want to run their new highway through it and evict him again.
This is literally treating What like the disenfranchised Jewish people. Keep removing them from one place, saying they can go somewhere else, only to remove them from their too.
Title: Re: [Meta-Discussion] Should what be glined from FishNet?
Post by: Ozmiander on May 28, 2020, 12:08:59 pm
I change my mind, gline everyone BUT what.
Title: Re: [Meta-Discussion] Should what be glined from FishNet?
Post by: kayimbo on May 28, 2020, 12:10:03 pm
i agree with emcy and nicefish.

I like what he is cool, also you need what for the snek\what synergy.
Title: Re: [Meta-Discussion] Should what be glined from FishNet?
Post by: rachel on May 28, 2020, 05:55:29 pm
You know what this reminds me of? Gentrification.
Evict what from #wetfish to #freefish because he doesn't have enough social capital.
Then decide that you want to be in #freefish, so you boot what even further.
No wait, even worse, people complaining about what in #freefish are pulling an Amy Cooper -- make a call to rachel in attempt to get what glined.

Freef is literally What's home provided by the state, and now that people want to run their new highway through it and evict him again.
This is literally treating What like the disenfranchised Jewish people. Keep removing them from one place, saying they can go somewhere else, only to remove them from their too.

you heard it here first: what is a jew
Title: Re: [Meta-Discussion] Should what be glined from FishNet?
Post by: h on May 28, 2020, 06:01:53 pm
keep freefish weird
Title: Re: [Meta-Discussion] Should what be glined from FishNet?
Post by: here cums the fuck truck on May 28, 2020, 07:43:14 pm
but what is "a jew"?
Title: Re: [Meta-Discussion] Should what be glined from FishNet?
Post by: rachel on May 28, 2020, 09:51:27 pm
but what is "a jew"?

don't go asking jewish questions... it won't lead anywhere good
Title: Re: [Meta-Discussion] Should what be glined from FishNet?
Post by: emergence on May 28, 2020, 11:03:59 pm
What sucks but freefish exists for that.

The only thing that's annoying is that serious discussions that are somewhat controversial (politics, coronavirus, etc) get relegated to freefish, where they get drowned out by shitposting. But there are already a lot of existing channels, and another one sounds onerous.

idk mang I don't have all the answers.
Title: Re: [Meta-Discussion] Should what be glined from FishNet?
Post by: woodneko on May 29, 2020, 08:43:50 pm
What is pretty cool. He says dumb and racist stuff but if you take that kind of stuff seriously then don't go in #freefish. If it weren't for people like what, wetfish wouldn't be wetfish. Also I miss rossthefox, wish he was around more. Super chill to talk to. Anyways, without what, #freefish would just be #wetfish2 and that's dumb.

You gotta see people for more than their stupidity, imo.
Title: Re: [Meta-Discussion] Should what be glined from FishNet?
Post by: ceph on May 29, 2020, 08:44:02 pm
No.

If you gline what you gline me.
Title: Re: [Meta-Discussion] Should what be glined from FishNet?
Post by: ceph on May 29, 2020, 08:44:39 pm
I'll cut my fuckin cock right off

Excuse me. I got emotional.
Title: Re: [Meta-Discussion] Should what be glined from FishNet?
Post by: Ozmiander on May 30, 2020, 11:36:52 am
Name and shame the passive aggressive people that whine to the admins in private instead.
Title: Re: [Meta-Discussion] Should what be glined from FishNet?
Post by: here cums the fuck truck on June 01, 2020, 08:33:29 am
Name and shame the passive aggressive people that whine to the admins in private instead.

yeah i was just coming here to say this

if the real problem is people whining, fuckin let em have it for whining

nobody likes a tattletale

and appeal to authority is the least cool thing you can do on wetfish
Title: Re: [Meta-Discussion] Should what be glined from FishNet?
Post by: Yam on June 01, 2020, 08:44:02 am
No, #freefish wouldn't be very free if you could get banned for saying shit in there.

Anyone complaining should realise it's #freefish.

Tho if he's harassing people in PMs then ye, ban him.