Discussion Forums => General Discussion => Topic started by: h on May 20, 2021, 09:44:52 pm
Title: should floof be removed from freefish
Post by: h on May 20, 2021, 09:44:52 pm
should floof be removed from freefish
Edit:
For clarification, Floof has already been removed from wetfish and all officially maintained wetfish channels (dryfish, anime, crypto, etc.) since 2019.
As such I have edited the original title of this thread "should floof be removed from wetfish" to the more accurate title "should floof be removed from freefish"
Title: Re: should floof be removed from wetfish
Post by: rachel on May 20, 2021, 09:54:06 pm
what did he do this time?
as far as I know he just stays in freefish and doesn't do anything besides ramble on about bullshit
if you really don't like him that much why don't you just /ignore him? or leave freefish?
frob made #politics specifically for this reason, and to be honest I like that channel better
Title: Re: should floof be removed from wetfish
Post by: FrobtheBuilder on May 20, 2021, 10:20:20 pm
holy shit yes totally unrelated: you know how /pol/ is supposed to be a "containment board" on 4chan and you never have to go there if you don't want to, except it actually just attracts the worst kind of people on the planet who then use it to brainwash users of other boards who stumble upon it, contaminating the entire userbase of the site to the point where the go-to insult on /v/ is now just "tranny" or a huge copypasta about not being a woman?
anyway just food for thought
Title: Re: should floof be removed from wetfish
Post by: Ozmiander on May 20, 2021, 10:21:11 pm
Ban me instead. Ultimately, this is an ozmiander problem.
Title: Re: should floof be removed from wetfish
Post by: meleeman on May 20, 2021, 10:39:14 pm
please don't ban floof. I love him. he's my second favorite autist
Title: Re: should floof be removed from wetfish
Post by: Anomaly on May 20, 2021, 10:55:43 pm
Nobody has managed to articulate to me or even answer my questions on how floof is worse or even on the same level as the actively racist, bigoted, belligerent, and abusively mentally ill crazies we've had to deal with in the past. Furthermore, they also fail to articulate how their nightmare scenarios about newbies being driven away and containment boards turning malignant - again, entirely due to his mere presence - will actually come true. As such, I cannot support banning him, and wish to vote against this amendment or w/e.
Title: Re: should floof be removed from wetfish
Post by: kayimbo on May 20, 2021, 11:01:02 pm
hell no floof is great.
Title: Re: should floof be removed from wetfish
Post by: Qwan on May 20, 2021, 11:04:36 pm
Nobody has managed to articulate to me or even answer my questions on how floof is worse or even on the same level as the actively racist, bigoted, belligerent, and abusively mentally ill crazies we've had to deal with in the past. Furthermore, they also fail to articulate how their nightmare scenarios about newbies being driven away and containment boards turning malignant- again, entirely due to his presence - will actually come true. As such, I cannot support banning him, and wish to vote against this amendment or w/e.
Nobody has managed to articulate to me or even answer my questions on how floof is worse or even on the same level as the actively racist, bigoted, belligerent, and abusively mentally ill crazies we've had to deal with in the past. Furthermore, they also fail to articulate how their nightmare scenarios about newbies being driven away and containment boards turning malignant- again, entirely due to his presence - will actually come true. As such, I cannot support banning him, and wish to vote against this amendment or w/e.
This is not a far fetched scenario and has almost certainly happened.
As per our discussion in #reef, the wetfish meta-moderation discussion channel, freefish and poomp are both secret channels that do not appear in the directory listing anymore.
Title: Re: should floof be removed from wetfish
Post by: Anomaly on May 20, 2021, 11:11:18 pm
Nobody has managed to articulate to me or even answer my questions on how floof is worse or even on the same level as the actively racist, bigoted, belligerent, and abusively mentally ill crazies we've had to deal with in the past. Furthermore, they also fail to articulate how their nightmare scenarios about newbies being driven away and containment boards turning malignant- again, entirely due to his presence - will actually come true. As such, I cannot support banning him, and wish to vote against this amendment or w/e.
This is not a far fetched scenario and has almost certainly happened.
Please note that in my post you quoted I was talking about floof, who is the topic of this thread. Not #poomp. Still, nobody has given me a straight answer on why floof should be banned, and everyone who wants him banned has just gone back to arguing with him in #freefish instead of doing something more productive with their time.
Title: Re: should floof be removed from wetfish
Post by: rachel on May 20, 2021, 11:48:42 pm
Update: Despite the current poll results of 5 for and 6 against banning floof, kate has taken it upon herself to ban floof from #freefish
Title: Re: should floof be removed from wetfish
Post by: tawd on May 21, 2021, 12:29:53 am
I haven't seen anyone quit #wetfish cause anything going on in #freefish
Maybe we need to have even more segregation. Someone could join #wetfish and see all sorts of non floof related stuff and get pretty turned off pretty quick. We'd better make sure to start punishing people for any kind of horny outside of #pornfish and make a #transfish for trans issues/hormone stuff and a #skyfish for talking about the weather and a #coloradofish for talking about anything related to colorado and a #stonedfish for anytime anyone is talking about dudeweed and a #gamingfish for anyone talking about any kind of gaming and just make #wetfish a G rated memes and greetings/welcome/no cursing/vulgarity or anything too in depth. We should start rate limiting the channels too so people can only say a few lines a day in main channels. Oh god and the bots and their random shit, That could totally scare someone off who doesn't realize it's a bot!
You folks are right, we gotta take these potential conflicts and scary internet things more seriously if this IRC community is ever going to grow and truly hold onto any new quality members.
How about just making it so nobody can say anything in any of the IRC Channels on wetfish except rachel and everyone else just has to PM each other lest someone get offended?
Title: Re: should floof be removed from wetfish
Post by: rachel on May 21, 2021, 12:34:18 am
... and a #skyfish for talking about the weather and a #coloradofish for talking about anything related to colorado ...
There actually already is a #colorado channel.... Lol, just saying
You mean... I've been a member of this network for years now and theres channels I don't even know/totally forgot exist or I just don't even go in them and it has no effect or bearing on my life or day to day decisions or mental well being what so ever?!??!?! Maybe I can teach everyone this power, my gift.
Title: Re: should floof be removed from wetfish
Post by: rachel on May 21, 2021, 12:41:00 am
... and a #skyfish for talking about the weather and a #coloradofish for talking about anything related to colorado ...
There actually already is a #colorado channel.... Lol, just saying
You mean... I've been a member of this network for years now and theres channels I don't even know/totally forgot exist or I just don't even go in them and it has no effect or bearing on my life or day to day decisions or mental well being what so ever?!??!?! Maybe I can teach everyone this power, my gift.
Hey I see where you're coming from but it's coming off as pretty sarcastic and condescending. Let's all just get along and hold hands please
Title: Re: should floof be removed from wetfish
Post by: tawd on May 21, 2021, 12:44:22 am
... and a #skyfish for talking about the weather and a #coloradofish for talking about anything related to colorado ...
There actually already is a #colorado channel.... Lol, just saying
You mean... I've been a member of this network for years now and theres channels I don't even know/totally forgot exist or I just don't even go in them and it has no effect or bearing on my life or day to day decisions or mental well being what so ever?!??!?! Maybe I can teach everyone this power, my gift.
Hey I see where you're coming from but it's coming off as pretty sarcastic and condescending. Let's all just get along and hold hands please
sure but uh socially distanced.
Title: Re: should floof be removed from wetfish
Post by: Diabolizer on May 21, 2021, 06:37:25 am
Banning someone for being wrong or obnoxious seems contrary to the general feeling of this place. Everyone here has annoyed me at some point in time or another. Well except for kate, but her time is coming. And that goes double for myself. I'm sure I've stepped on toes here and that's even with my pathological need to be liked (have you ever noticed that?).
I would have preferred a temp ban, some kind of penance, or the silent treatment where we all pretend that we have floof on ignore for a half hour and shame him in the third person. Like say things like, "floof is so bad at personal hygiene." Or we could all scream at him till he cries. I think that's what the Maoists did.
Anyway, since I still get to talk to him in #flooffish, I don't actually care.
Title: Re: should floof be removed from wetfish
Post by: emergence on May 21, 2021, 11:50:37 am
This is a decision about what you want wetfish to be.
I frequently hear about how it’s a goal to make wetfish more diverse. When you allow channels like freefish and poomp to exist on the network, and people from these groups join the network and see the kind of content that’s permitted on those channels, they will probably decide not to stay.
Many users who made excellent contributions have left over the years because the network allows this kind of behavior.
So from my perspective, it’s really a question of what you value more: do you want to make the network a place that’s welcoming to a more diverse community, or do you want to keep it the way it is?
I am not in freefish and I have floof on /ignore, but new users are just going to leave the network instead.
¯
Title: Re: should floof be removed from wetfish
Post by: kayimbo on May 21, 2021, 12:04:37 pm
This is a decision about what you want wetfish to be.
I frequently hear about how it’s a goal to make wetfish more diverse. When you allow channels like freefish and poomp to exist on the network, and people from these groups join the network and see the kind of content that’s permitted on those channels, they will probably decide not to stay.
Many users who made excellent contributions have left over the years because the network allows this kind of behavior.
So from my perspective, it’s really a question of what you value more: do you want to make the network a place that’s welcoming to a more diverse community, or do you want to keep it the way it is?
I am not in freefish and I have floof on /ignore, but new users are just going to leave the network instead.
¯
lowkey vote to ban what again.
floof may have an awkward communication style, but he is pretty far from... i dunno, whatever what is. Most of arguements involving floof are 3 people calling him rslurred over and over and him repeating his nonsense ar
Title: Re: should floof be removed from wetfish
Post by: ceph on May 21, 2021, 01:02:58 pm
This is a decision about what you want wetfish to be.
I frequently hear about how it’s a goal to make wetfish more diverse. When you allow channels like freefish and poomp to exist on the network, and people from these groups join the network and see the kind of content that’s permitted on those channels, they will probably decide not to stay.
Many users who made excellent contributions have left over the years because the network allows this kind of behavior.
So from my perspective, it’s really a question of what you value more: do you want to make the network a place that’s welcoming to a more diverse community, or do you want to keep it the way it is?
I am not in freefish and I have floof on /ignore, but new users are just going to leave the network instead.
¯
I agree this is a decision about what Wetfish wants to be. I disagree that restricting expression or behavior fosters diversity.
The more rules you put on behavior, the more limits you put on expression, the more ideas that are deemed offensive or "retarded", the closer you get to a monoculture. It may be true that your monoculture appeals to a broader user base, but that doesn't equal diversity. Strictly speaking, a monoculture requires less diversity than a pluralist community. Despite the fact that it includes more people that agree with you, it also excludes people that hold different values. Pluralism is uncomfortable, it guarantees conflict, but by definition it is more diverse and inclusive of different schools of thought.
People that reject this setup are authoritarians. Not making a value judgment, just want to be clear that the argument that's being made against the existing laissez-faire policy is authoritarian in nature.
Wetfish is already diverse. How many communities do you know of that have users with polar opposite political views? To me that is a special thing about wetfish and worth defending. I like being able to find the common humanity in people I disagree with. Frob and I have even bonded a couple times over similar struggles and Frob hates my guts. That's beautiful.
I would rather attract users that are OK with ignoring users or parting channels they don't like. If that means scaring away authoritarians and proponents of monoculture du jour, so be it. That's my 2 cents. Which do we value more? Rachel has already expressed her preference to keep things free and diverse the way they are. I agree.
Title: Re: should floof be removed from wetfish
Post by: kayimbo on May 21, 2021, 03:05:36 pm
I agree this is a decision about what Wetfish wants to be. I disagree that restricting expression or behavior fosters diversity.
The more rules you put on behavior, the more limits you put on expression, the more ideas that are deemed offensive or "retarded", the closer you get to a monoculture. It may be true that your monoculture appeals to a broader user base, but that doesn't equal diversity. Strictly speaking, a monoculture requires less diversity than a pluralist community. Despite the fact that it includes more people that agree with you, it also excludes people that hold different values. Pluralism is uncomfortable, it guarantees conflict, but by definition it is more diverse and inclusive of different schools of thought.
People that reject this setup are authoritarians. Not making a value judgment, just want to be clear that the argument that's being made against the existing laissez-faire policy is authoritarian in nature.
Wetfish is already diverse. How many communities do you know of that have users with polar opposite political views? To me that is a special thing about wetfish and worth defending. I like being able to find the common humanity in people I disagree with. Frob and I have even bonded a couple times over similar struggles and Frob hates my guts. That's beautiful.
I would rather attract users that are OK with ignoring users or parting channels they don't like. If that means scaring away authoritarians and proponents of monoculture du jour, so be it. That's my 2 cents. Which do we value more? Rachel has already expressed her preference to keep things free and diverse the way they are. I agree.
boat
Title: Re: should floof be removed from wetfish
Post by: Ozmiander on May 21, 2021, 03:40:09 pm
What the FUCK is this dumb shit?
Title: Re: should floof be removed from wetfish
Post by: Ozmiander on May 21, 2021, 03:42:52 pm
Who the fuck cares about floof? Care about bullshit refusal to moderate the server and enforce simple rules like "don't ban evade" and not just throwing up your hands and getting mad when people expect much better from you, especially as you bleed users because of it.
Title: Re: should floof be removed from wetfish
Post by: rachel on May 21, 2021, 04:52:51 pm
Who the fuck cares about floof? Care about bullshit refusal to moderate the server and enforce simple rules like "don't ban evade" and not just throwing up your hands and getting mad when people expect much better from you, especially as you bleed users because of it.
5 people voted for the removal of floof, 7 people voted against the removal of floof. You say people "expect much better from me" and I "refuse to moderate the server"
Why should I take moderation action when a majority of people want him here?
Why is it so hard for people to simply leave #freefish?
How is quitting the entire network somehow a more sensible thing to do than leave a single channel?
Title: Re: should floof be removed from wetfish
Post by: Ozmiander on May 21, 2021, 07:06:52 pm
You still refuse to see why people are actually mad for some reason..
Title: Re: should floof be removed from wetfish
Post by: rachel on May 21, 2021, 07:13:30 pm
Because you ignore any problems, then handwave them, then flip out and call everyone whiners
Freefish is moderated by ceph. It's his channel. You are deciding that this is my problem.
In your mind, what action should I take? Some people are saying that I need to "remove the tumor" and shut down these channels completely. Others are saying that is insane and they don't want the channel closed, they just hate floof!
If you really don't like floof that much, just leave the channel. Or ignore him. You're saying that it's MY DUTY to go into ceph's channel and remove somebody because you and a couple of your friends find him annoying?
Can you please articulate what you think should be done instead of just telling me to "do my job"?
Title: Re: should floof be removed from wetfish
Post by: Ozmiander on May 21, 2021, 07:41:37 pm
You don't get to shrik responsibility for free fish because YOU own it. You are responsible for every channel on your network. And I am NOT calling for you to ban him because he's annoying, that's why I LIKE him being there.nim telling you to ban him because he ban evades and straight up tells you there's nothing you can do about it, and you ignore it like every other problem on wetfish.
Title: Re: should floof be removed from wetfish
Post by: rachel on May 21, 2021, 07:52:49 pm
You don't get to shrik responsibility for free fish because YOU own it. You are responsible for every channel on your network. And I am NOT calling for you to ban him because he's annoying, that's why I LIKE him being there.nim telling you to ban him because he ban evades and straight up tells you there's nothing you can do about it, and you ignore it like every other problem on wetfish.
Why do you think I am ignoring anything? I've talked with floof in PM and on mumble and he has agreed to stay in freefish.
So why does it matter if he has a bunch of proxies if he agrees to stay out of Wetfish?
That's why he's not network banned.
Title: Re: should floof be removed from wetfish
Post by: rachel on May 21, 2021, 08:04:17 pm
Despite ceph removing +m from freefish and kate's +o, floof has not returned to the channel. He is now staying exclusively in flooffish.
So the ban evasion argument doesn't really work either. He isn't ban evading. No more floof in freefish. Yay, we did it reddit!
Title: Re: should floof be removed from wetfish
Post by: rachel on May 21, 2021, 08:17:27 pm
Quote
21:11 -!- prob [[email protected]] has joined #freefish 21:11 < prob> SEETHE KATE AND FROB 21:11 < prob> SEEEEEEETHE 21:12 -!- prob is now known as fl00f 21:12 <@rachel> um 21:12 <@rachel> hey 21:12 -!- fl00f changed the topic of #freefish to: The Proof is in the Fl00f 21:12 <@rachel> floof are you ban evading? 21:12 -!- fl00f [[email protected]] has quit [Quit: kuz fuck kate] 21:12 <@rachel> sorry but 21:12 <@rachel> nope
Meanwhile in #flooffish
Quote
21:12 < rachel> floof: 21:12 < rachel> it looks like you just ban evaded in freefish 21:12 <@floof> yes I did 21:12 < rachel> I'm sorry but this is against the network rules 21:12 <@floof> lol 21:13 < rachel> https://wetfishonline.com/forum/index.php?topic=3702.msg25270#msg25270 21:13 < Honk_> [ should floof be removed from wetfish - Wetfish Online ] 21:13 < rachel> you can see this post here 21:13 < rachel> which I just made 21:13 * floof checks post 21:13 < rachel> only moments before you started ban evading 21:13 < rachel> really an 21:13 < rachel> ironic twist 21:13 < rachel> so 21:13 < rachel> therefore 21:13 < rachel> you are actually in violation of network rules 21:13 < rachel> so 21:13 <@floof> u banned me from wetfish 21:13 <@floof> u didn't say shit about freefish 21:13 <@floof> kate/frob banned me 21:14 < rachel> a ban is a ban bro 21:14 < rachel> ur banned right now 21:14 < rachel> and you evaded 21:14 <@floof> aite 21:14 -!- kakama [[email protected]] has joined #Flooffish 21:14 <@floof> I'll call that valid 21:14 < rachel> yo it's kakama 21:14 <@floof> who is kakama 21:14 <@floof> idk a kakama 21:15 < kakama> so this is where that femboy who's causing all the chit chatting is 21:15 < rachel> no 21:15 < rachel> the femboy left 21:15 < rachel> because of the floof drama 21:15 < kakama> oh sad 21:15 < kakama> F for my femboy brothers 21:15 <@floof> no one even knows who the fuck I am 21:15 <@floof> they think I'm b 21:15 <@floof> or what's that bitch 21:15 <@floof> blaine? 21:15 <@floof> fuck 21:16 < rachel> floof so 21:16 < rachel> you um 21:16 < rachel> violated networok rules 21:16 <@floof> mhm 21:16 < rachel> I'm gonna have to gline you for 72 hours I hope you understand 21:16 < rachel> please don't continue to ban evade 21:16 <@floof> nah I can just quit 21:16 <@floof> I get it 21:16 < rachel> okay 21:16 -!- floof [[email protected]] has quit [Quit: _]
Title: Re: should floof be removed from wetfish
Post by: h on May 21, 2021, 10:10:38 pm
just to add to the record, floof has, in fact, ban evaded multiple times in the past, not counting today and yesterday's evasion:
in #wetfish
Quote
Oct 02 20:44:29 <Ozmiander> hi floof, you appear to be ban evading Oct 02 20:44:42 <floof> [21:43:24] <Ozmiander> ok floof, join #wetfish Oct 02 20:44:50 * rachel gives channel operator status to Ozmiander Oct 02 20:44:52 <rachel> lololol Oct 02 20:44:56 * Ozmiander sets ban on *!*@Fish-02qfjl.mullvad.net Oct 02 20:44:57 <Anomaly> anarchy Oct 02 20:45:02 * Ozmiander has kicked floof from #wetfish (nerd) Oct 02 20:45:32 <luke> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZB7zFRBvGXs Oct 02 20:45:54 <Ozmiander> not gonna lie guys Oct 02 20:45:59 <Ozmiander> banning by nick is pretty dumb Oct 02 20:46:19 <luke> why'd floof get banned from wetfish? Oct 02 20:46:31 <Ozmiander> he's been banned for a hot minute Oct 02 20:46:36 <Qwan> have you seen him talk Oct 02 20:46:39 * helenski ([email protected]) has joined Oct 02 20:46:42 <helenski> This is ban evading ozmiander. Ur a dumfuk Oct 02 20:46:44 <helenski> ;3 Oct 02 20:46:47 * Ozmiander sets ban on *!*@Fish-pnm.vn7.213.185.IP Oct 02 20:46:50 * Ozmiander has kicked helenski from #wetfish (Ozmiander)
<this repeats about 10 times with different IPs>
in #freefish
Quote
Dec 30 01:39:51 <floooo0oooof> .tell what floof can poof poof Dec 30 01:39:51 <Fiolina> floooo0oooof: I'll pass that on when what is around. Dec 30 01:39:57 * what has kicked floooo0oooof from #freefish (what) Dec 30 01:40:06 * floooo0oooof ([email protected]) has joined Dec 30 01:40:08 <floooo0oooof> <3 Dec 30 01:40:17 * what sets ban on *!*@*.i90.171.31.IP Dec 30 01:40:18 * what has kicked floooo0oooof from #freefish (what) Dec 30 01:40:50 <what> an immovable object meets an unstoppable force Dec 30 01:40:50 <Fiolina> what: 2020-12-30 - 07:39:38 <floooo0oooof> tell what floof can poof Dec 30 01:40:51 <Fiolina> what: 2020-12-30 - 07:39:51 <floooo0oooof> tell what floof can poof poof Dec 30 01:41:10 * floooof ([email protected]) has joined Dec 30 01:41:14 <floooof> sup trumper Dec 30 01:41:17 * what sets ban on *!*@*.n0d.206.116.IP Dec 30 01:41:17 * what has kicked floooof from #freefish (what) Dec 30 01:43:09 * vruxxmi ([email protected]) has joined Dec 30 01:43:12 <vruxxmi> behold Dec 30 01:43:18 * vruxxmi is now known as floooof Dec 30 01:43:22 <floooof> <3
<again, repeats about a dozen times>
Title: Re: should floof be removed from wetfish
Post by: what on May 22, 2021, 01:33:24 pm
just to add to the record, floof has, in fact, ban evaded multiple times in the past, not counting today and yesterday's evasion:
in #freefish
Quote
Dec 30 01:39:51 <floooo0oooof> .tell what floof can poof poof Dec 30 01:39:51 <Fiolina> floooo0oooof: I'll pass that on when what is around. Dec 30 01:39:57 * what has kicked floooo0oooof from #freefish (what) Dec 30 01:40:06 * floooo0oooof ([email protected]) has joined Dec 30 01:40:08 <floooo0oooof> <3 Dec 30 01:40:17 * what sets ban on *!*@*.i90.171.31.IP Dec 30 01:40:18 * what has kicked floooo0oooof from #freefish (what) Dec 30 01:40:50 <what> an immovable object meets an unstoppable force Dec 30 01:40:50 <Fiolina> what: 2020-12-30 - 07:39:38 <floooo0oooof> tell what floof can poof Dec 30 01:40:51 <Fiolina> what: 2020-12-30 - 07:39:51 <floooo0oooof> tell what floof can poof poof Dec 30 01:41:10 * floooof ([email protected]) has joined Dec 30 01:41:14 <floooof> sup trumper Dec 30 01:41:17 * what sets ban on *!*@*.n0d.206.116.IP Dec 30 01:41:17 * what has kicked floooof from #freefish (what) Dec 30 01:43:09 * vruxxmi ([email protected]) has joined Dec 30 01:43:12 <vruxxmi> behold Dec 30 01:43:18 * vruxxmi is now known as floooof Dec 30 01:43:22 <floooof> <3
<again, repeats about a dozen times>
When I was banning floof it was as a joke at first, then he kept evading so I figured I'd see how many ips he had. Still have them in a .txt file. Ended up being 14 unique ips before he relented and started the bargaining phase lol
The bans were reversed 10 minutes later. Don't use me for your commie witch hunt
Title: Re: should floof be removed from freefish
Post by: here cums the fuck truck on May 26, 2021, 09:37:28 pm
lol
Title: Re: should floof be removed from wetfish
Post by: floof on May 30, 2021, 10:54:33 am
just to add to the record, floof has, in fact, ban evaded multiple times in the past, not counting today and yesterday's evasion:
in #freefish
Quote
Dec 30 01:39:51 <floooo0oooof> .tell what floof can poof poof Dec 30 01:39:51 <Fiolina> floooo0oooof: I'll pass that on when what is around. Dec 30 01:39:57 * what has kicked floooo0oooof from #freefish (what) Dec 30 01:40:06 * floooo0oooof ([email protected]) has joined Dec 30 01:40:08 <floooo0oooof> <3 Dec 30 01:40:17 * what sets ban on *!*@*.i90.171.31.IP Dec 30 01:40:18 * what has kicked floooo0oooof from #freefish (what) Dec 30 01:40:50 <what> an immovable object meets an unstoppable force Dec 30 01:40:50 <Fiolina> what: 2020-12-30 - 07:39:38 <floooo0oooof> tell what floof can poof Dec 30 01:40:51 <Fiolina> what: 2020-12-30 - 07:39:51 <floooo0oooof> tell what floof can poof poof Dec 30 01:41:10 * floooof ([email protected]) has joined Dec 30 01:41:14 <floooof> sup trumper Dec 30 01:41:17 * what sets ban on *!*@*.n0d.206.116.IP Dec 30 01:41:17 * what has kicked floooof from #freefish (what) Dec 30 01:43:09 * vruxxmi ([email protected]) has joined Dec 30 01:43:12 <vruxxmi> behold Dec 30 01:43:18 * vruxxmi is now known as floooof Dec 30 01:43:22 <floooof> <3
<again, repeats about a dozen times>
When I was banning floof it was as a joke at first, then he kept evading so I figured I'd see how many ips he had. Still have them in a .txt file. Ended up being 14 unique ips before he relented and started the bargaining phase lol
The bans were reversed 10 minutes later. Don't use me for your commie witch hunt
What, as floof himself is here to say, you are a fucking liar. You quit banning me when others in #Freefish called you out, such as Rothen, I think also kmbo.
I don't have the logs because: 1) I don't log, I have scrollback in RAM 2) I re-installed the OS on this device, since the event occurred.
I am going to start logging just so I can start proving shit. I am one of those "Just for the record" types of annoying people. I really get annoyed when people DON'T tell a story the way it ACTUALLY happened.
That is all.
Title: Re: should floof be removed from freefish
Post by: here cums the fuck truck on May 30, 2021, 02:47:58 pm
floof tried to blackmail me with pictures of my dick
Title: Re: should floof be removed from freefish
Post by: Ozmiander on May 31, 2021, 09:25:25 am
just to add to the record, floof has, in fact, ban evaded multiple times in the past, not counting today and yesterday's evasion:
in #freefish
Quote
Dec 30 01:39:51 <floooo0oooof> .tell what floof can poof poof Dec 30 01:39:51 <Fiolina> floooo0oooof: I'll pass that on when what is around. Dec 30 01:39:57 * what has kicked floooo0oooof from #freefish (what) Dec 30 01:40:06 * floooo0oooof ([email protected]) has joined Dec 30 01:40:08 <floooo0oooof> <3 Dec 30 01:40:17 * what sets ban on *!*@*.i90.171.31.IP Dec 30 01:40:18 * what has kicked floooo0oooof from #freefish (what) Dec 30 01:40:50 <what> an immovable object meets an unstoppable force Dec 30 01:40:50 <Fiolina> what: 2020-12-30 - 07:39:38 <floooo0oooof> tell what floof can poof Dec 30 01:40:51 <Fiolina> what: 2020-12-30 - 07:39:51 <floooo0oooof> tell what floof can poof poof Dec 30 01:41:10 * floooof ([email protected]) has joined Dec 30 01:41:14 <floooof> sup trumper Dec 30 01:41:17 * what sets ban on *!*@*.n0d.206.116.IP Dec 30 01:41:17 * what has kicked floooof from #freefish (what) Dec 30 01:43:09 * vruxxmi ([email protected]) has joined Dec 30 01:43:12 <vruxxmi> behold Dec 30 01:43:18 * vruxxmi is now known as floooof Dec 30 01:43:22 <floooof> <3
<again, repeats about a dozen times>
When I was banning floof it was as a joke at first, then he kept evading so I figured I'd see how many ips he had. Still have them in a .txt file. Ended up being 14 unique ips before he relented and started the bargaining phase lol
The bans were reversed 10 minutes later. Don't use me for your commie witch hunt
What, as floof himself is here to say, you are a fucking liar. You quit banning me when others in #Freefish called you out, such as Rothen, I think also kmbo.
I don't have the logs because: 1) I don't log, I have scrollback in RAM 2) I re-installed the OS on this device, since the event occurred.
I am going to start logging just so I can start proving shit. I am one of those "Just for the record" types of annoying people. I really get annoyed when people DON'T tell a story the way it ACTUALLY happened.
That is all.
ask them then u fucking autist. I was laughing at u and said it was just to fuck with you while you were switching IPs
Title: Re: should floof be removed from freefish
Post by: here cums the fuck truck on June 01, 2021, 08:48:03 pm