Idea: wetfish plays IRC bot development

All wetfish members get to push code to a repository. If it builds and passes some unit tests, the bot will automatically reload with the new code. If not, the commits will be reverted.

If it builds and passes some unit tests, the bot will automatically reload with the new code.

do you have any idea what that means

Quote from: nicefish on July 26, 2017, 01:47:47 pm

If it builds and passes some unit tests, the bot will automatically reload with the new code.

do you have any idea what that means

I'm not sure what you mean.

Quote from: h on July 26, 2017, 01:57:31 pm

Quote from: nicefish on July 26, 2017, 01:47:47 pm

If it builds and passes some unit tests, the bot will automatically reload with the new code.

do you have any idea what that means

I'm not sure what you mean.

>people on the internet will get to push actual code onto a shell owned by whoever decides to host this

yeah Idk if "anyone can make the bot do whatever they want as long as it works" is a great idea. Maybe if we could vote on them or something before they're implemented. Otherwise seems like a great way to invite tons of channel flood at the very least.

Quote from: nicefish on July 26, 2017, 02:02:27 pm

Quote from: h on July 26, 2017, 01:57:31 pm

Quote from: nicefish on July 26, 2017, 01:47:47 pm

If it builds and passes some unit tests, the bot will automatically reload with the new code.

do you have any idea what that means

I'm not sure what you mean.

>people on the internet will get to push actual code onto a shell owned by whoever decides to host this

but we'll know who did it, b/c only wetfish members would be allowed to push code.

yeah Idk if "anyone can make the bot do whatever they want as long as it works" is a great idea. Maybe if we could vote on them or something before they're implemented. Otherwise seems like a great way to invite tons of channel flood at the very least.

you can undo their changes. :)

Quote from: redheron on July 26, 2017, 02:07:18 pm

yeah Idk if "anyone can make the bot do whatever they want as long as it works" is a great idea. Maybe if we could vote on them or something before they're implemented. Otherwise seems like a great way to invite tons of channel flood at the very least.

you can undo their changes. :)

yeah I'd rather have a system in place to prevent malicious changes in the first place rather than having to undo them

assuming someone notices the second channel flood starts, the channel is still flooding before the changes revert.

assuming said changes are as benign and noticable as channel flood.

rather have a single person (like, rachel) with power to commit and revert. automating human trust is seldomly a good idea.

rather have a single person (like, rachel) with power to commit and revert. automating human trust is seldomly a good idea.

then at that point it's just a collaborative IRC bot project
and that's not fun

Quote from: here cums the fuck truck on July 26, 2017, 02:38:10 pm

rather have a single person (like, rachel) with power to commit and revert. automating human trust is seldomly a good idea.

then at that point it's just a collaborative IRC bot project
and that's not fun

everyone knows it's not fun unless it's ~*risky~*

Quote from: h on July 26, 2017, 03:25:10 pm

Quote from: here cums the fuck truck on July 26, 2017, 02:38:10 pm

rather have a single person (like, rachel) with power to commit and revert. automating human trust is seldomly a good idea.

then at that point it's just a collaborative IRC bot project
and that's not fun

everyone knows it's not fun unless it's ~*risky~*

did he shave hearts into his body hair

I'll make sure to change everything so it's only on one line

RACHEL TIPPED 69 CORAL FOR THIS POST

did he shave hearts into his body hair

he kinda reminds me of adrian xD

everyone knows it's not fun unless it's ~*risky~*