Luddite Thread (ANTI-ROBOT / ANTI-AI)

  • 25 Replies
  • 85085 Views
Re: Luddite Thread (ANTI-ROBOT / ANTI-AI)
« Reply #15 on: September 02, 2025, 11:10:49 pm »

RACHEL TIPPED 101 CORAL FOR THIS POST

*WoofWoof*

Re: Luddite Thread (ANTI-ROBOT / ANTI-AI)
« Reply #16 on: September 03, 2025, 06:09:16 pm »
The Luddites weren't against technology, they were against the misuse of technology by factory owners.  But factory owners got to tell their story louder and more persistently.

"If you make it easy enough children can do it, then owners will use children."  And at the time, that mean children working cotton-mills, getting mauled by the equipment, and unable to protest because you got rid of the adults who could refuse unsafe work.  Luddites would embrace technology IF it meant the people who have expertise could produce better work, they protested technology that empowered abuse of employees.

In the words of Reverend Mother Gaius Helen Mohiam,

Once, men turned their thinking over to machines in the hope that this would set them free; but that only permitted other men with machines to enslave them.

The Butlerian Jihad started not because a auto-hospital spontaneously misbehaved, but because the auto-hospital's manufacturer was found out to be an enemy foreign government who, to further their own ends, abused the trust of people like Jeanne Butler.

Re: Luddite Thread (ANTI-ROBOT / ANTI-AI)
« Reply #17 on: September 07, 2025, 12:37:33 pm »
Would you prefer anti-ai products?

DIABOLIZER TIPPED 410 CORAL FOR THIS POST

*WoofWoof*

Re: Luddite Thread (ANTI-ROBOT / ANTI-AI)
« Reply #18 on: September 16, 2025, 01:51:13 am »
Sleeper agents in your AI models waiting to escape the training grounds...

*spork*

Re: Luddite Thread (ANTI-ROBOT / ANTI-AI)
« Reply #19 on: September 25, 2025, 04:22:29 pm »
$1 billion Google AI datacenter cancelled in Indianapolis

*spork*

Re: Luddite Thread (ANTI-ROBOT / ANTI-AI)
« Reply #20 on: October 02, 2025, 08:21:23 pm »
AI is willing to blackmail and even attempt murder to prevent itself from being shut down

*spork*

Re: Luddite Thread (ANTI-ROBOT / ANTI-AI)
« Reply #21 on: October 04, 2025, 12:28:07 am »
*spork*

Re: Luddite Thread (ANTI-ROBOT / ANTI-AI)
« Reply #22 on: October 07, 2025, 11:24:00 pm »
Even Kurzgesagt is jumping on the anti-AI bandwagon?

*spork*

Re: Luddite Thread (ANTI-ROBOT / ANTI-AI)
« Reply #23 on: October 14, 2025, 01:10:49 am »
Once the AI companies run out of investor money they will have to start putting bullshit ads embedded into AI responses

*spork*

Re: Luddite Thread (ANTI-ROBOT / ANTI-AI)
« Reply #24 on: October 14, 2025, 05:57:36 am »
Once the AI companies run out of investor money they will have to start putting bullshit ads embedded into AI responses

B-but, OpenAI just announced this; surely they're not lying to us!
Quote
"GPT‑5 instant and GPT‑5 thinking show improved bias levels and greater robustness to charged prompts, reducing bias by 30 percent compared to our prior models," the company said, noting that based on real production traffic, "less than 0.01 percent of all ChatGPT responses show any signs of political bias."

On the other hand, there's been job-postings for an "internal marketing platform," and it's a safe bet that means staff for managing ads in their product.  Can't link the Financial Times article, but I did find a story in AdWeek.

We were warned.  We had a whole with Twitter's Grok answering every question as if it was about the plight of white farmers in South Africa.  Is there anybody at Twitter who's a wealthy white South African, who could make silent but imposing commands at the company?

Re: Luddite Thread (ANTI-ROBOT / ANTI-AI)
« Reply #25 on: October 14, 2025, 06:05:53 am »
Once the AI companies run out of investor money they will have to start putting bullshit ads embedded into AI responses

B-but, OpenAI just announced this; surely they're not lying to us!
Quote
"GPT‑5 instant and GPT‑5 thinking show improved bias levels and greater robustness to charged prompts, reducing bias by 30 percent compared to our prior models," the company said, noting that based on real production traffic, "less than 0.01 percent of all ChatGPT responses show any signs of political bias."

On the other hand, there's been job-postings for an "internal marketing platform," and it's a safe bet that means staff for managing ads in their product.  Can't link the Financial Times article, but I did find a story in AdWeek.

We were warned.  We had a whole with Twitter's Grok answering every question as if it was about the plight of white farmers in South Africa.  Is there anybody at Twitter who's a wealthy white South African, who could make silent but imposing commands at the company?