Idea: wetfish plays IRC bot development

  • 14 Replies
  • 12912 Views
Idea: wetfish plays IRC bot development
« on: July 26, 2017, 01:47:47 pm »
All wetfish members get to push code to a repository. If it builds and passes some unit tests, the bot will automatically reload with the new code. If not, the commits will be reverted.

h's Avatar

h

Re: Idea: wetfish plays IRC bot development
« Reply #1 on: July 26, 2017, 01:57:31 pm »
If it builds and passes some unit tests, the bot will automatically reload with the new code.

do you have any idea what that means
dudeweed😂

Re: Idea: wetfish plays IRC bot development
« Reply #2 on: July 26, 2017, 02:02:27 pm »
If it builds and passes some unit tests, the bot will automatically reload with the new code.

do you have any idea what that means

I'm not sure what you mean.

h's Avatar

h

Re: Idea: wetfish plays IRC bot development
« Reply #3 on: July 26, 2017, 02:03:13 pm »
If it builds and passes some unit tests, the bot will automatically reload with the new code.

do you have any idea what that means

I'm not sure what you mean.

>people on the internet will get to push actual code onto a shell owned by whoever decides to host this
dudeweed😂

redheron's Avatar

redheron

Re: Idea: wetfish plays IRC bot development
« Reply #4 on: July 26, 2017, 02:07:18 pm »
yeah Idk if "anyone can make the bot do whatever they want as long as it works" is a great idea. Maybe if we could vote on them or something before they're implemented. Otherwise seems like a great way to invite tons of channel flood at the very least.

Re: Idea: wetfish plays IRC bot development
« Reply #5 on: July 26, 2017, 02:10:18 pm »
If it builds and passes some unit tests, the bot will automatically reload with the new code.

do you have any idea what that means

I'm not sure what you mean.

>people on the internet will get to push actual code onto a shell owned by whoever decides to host this

but we'll know who did it, b/c only wetfish members would be allowed to push code.

Re: Idea: wetfish plays IRC bot development
« Reply #6 on: July 26, 2017, 02:11:18 pm »
yeah Idk if "anyone can make the bot do whatever they want as long as it works" is a great idea. Maybe if we could vote on them or something before they're implemented. Otherwise seems like a great way to invite tons of channel flood at the very least.

you can undo their changes. :)

redheron's Avatar

redheron

Re: Idea: wetfish plays IRC bot development
« Reply #7 on: July 26, 2017, 02:22:14 pm »
yeah Idk if "anyone can make the bot do whatever they want as long as it works" is a great idea. Maybe if we could vote on them or something before they're implemented. Otherwise seems like a great way to invite tons of channel flood at the very least.

you can undo their changes. :)
yeah I'd rather have a system in place to prevent malicious changes in the first place rather than having to undo them

assuming someone notices the second channel flood starts, the channel is still flooding before the changes revert.

assuming said changes are as benign and noticable as channel flood.

Re: Idea: wetfish plays IRC bot development
« Reply #8 on: July 26, 2017, 02:38:10 pm »
rather have a single person (like, rachel) with power to commit and revert. automating human trust is seldomly a good idea.
m'lady

h's Avatar

h

Re: Idea: wetfish plays IRC bot development
« Reply #9 on: July 26, 2017, 03:25:10 pm »
rather have a single person (like, rachel) with power to commit and revert. automating human trust is seldomly a good idea.

then at that point it's just a collaborative IRC bot project
and that's not fun
dudeweed😂

Re: Idea: wetfish plays IRC bot development
« Reply #10 on: July 27, 2017, 08:05:08 am »
rather have a single person (like, rachel) with power to commit and revert. automating human trust is seldomly a good idea.

then at that point it's just a collaborative IRC bot project
and that's not fun

everyone knows it's not fun unless it's ~*risky~*

*spork*

redheron's Avatar

redheron

Re: Idea: wetfish plays IRC bot development
« Reply #11 on: July 27, 2017, 11:02:26 am »
rather have a single person (like, rachel) with power to commit and revert. automating human trust is seldomly a good idea.

then at that point it's just a collaborative IRC bot project
and that's not fun

everyone knows it's not fun unless it's ~*risky~*


did he shave hearts into his body hair

Re: Idea: wetfish plays IRC bot development
« Reply #12 on: July 27, 2017, 08:08:55 pm »
I'll make sure to change everything so it's only on one line

RACHEL TIPPED 69 CORAL FOR THIS POST

no don't

Re: Idea: wetfish plays IRC bot development
« Reply #13 on: July 30, 2017, 11:57:57 pm »
did he shave hearts into his body hair

he kinda reminds me of adrian xD
*spork*

Re: Idea: wetfish plays IRC bot development
« Reply #14 on: August 06, 2017, 03:59:41 pm »
everyone knows it's not fun unless it's ~*risky~*

*spork*