This a flammable topic; I must step carefully.
If a woman wants to get railed so hard she's walking funny, and people find out she has thoughts like this, then she loses status/power/support in many areas, and loses it for the foreseeable future (years!). Add to this how damned unfair it seems when men expressing such desires openly and getting applauded for it. So: get squeezed, spun around, filled like a volcano cake, get that euphoric high... but you don't have to suffer being called a "bad woman" because the responsibility isn't yours. If it was plausibly against your desires, then you can still enjoy the support of the community as a "good girl who wouldn't do such things." It's not a perfect defense, but fantasies don't have to be perfect.
The bitch of it is: in scenarios where there's *real* non-con, the woman gets accused of "asking for it" and gets that community support withdrawn even though she's a genuine "good girl" who got targeted by a crime... a fucking shame because recovering from damage and violation is when you need that community support the most.
People who want it need to be regarded as not wanting it, and people who don't want it get punished as if they wanted it... "consensual non-con" is a paradox but it makes sense in context (because the context is utterly terrible).
If a woman wants to get railed so hard she's walking funny, and people find out she has thoughts like this, then she loses status/power/support in many areas, and loses it for the foreseeable future (years!). Add to this how damned unfair it seems when men expressing such desires openly and getting applauded for it. So: get squeezed, spun around, filled like a volcano cake, get that euphoric high... but you don't have to suffer being called a "bad woman" because the responsibility isn't yours. If it was plausibly against your desires, then you can still enjoy the support of the community as a "good girl who wouldn't do such things." It's not a perfect defense, but fantasies don't have to be perfect.
The bitch of it is: in scenarios where there's *real* non-con, the woman gets accused of "asking for it" and gets that community support withdrawn even though she's a genuine "good girl" who got targeted by a crime... a fucking shame because recovering from damage and violation is when you need that community support the most.
People who want it need to be regarded as not wanting it, and people who don't want it get punished as if they wanted it... "consensual non-con" is a paradox but it makes sense in context (because the context is utterly terrible).
-
Fishmé tipped Cool Ranch Blue for this post
