does this count?
this argument is fucking dumb because those megaubercorporations addicted to money would probably much rather use the cheaper* marijuana alternative to provide a comparable product with a higher profit margin
*: if it's not cheaper why the FUCK would you use it
what cheaper alternative are you talking about? are you talking about synthetic weed? that shit is so bad for you
the cheaper alternative to various products listed(like industrial oil and shit) that incorporate marijuana in some way
why do you think the alternatives would be cheaper? hemp is basically a grass. I don't know about the rest of it, but I'm pretty sure hemp grows faster than paper trees..
unless the alternative is cheaper in some way, why would anyone use the alternative?
cheaper doesn't have to be about money
The problem with hemp is that it's democratic. It doesn't require special care or fancy lab equipment?it's a plant, anyone can produce it, and it can't be patented without genetic modification. Companies prefer synthetics because they can use the law to control production and eliminate the risk of competition.